05 ENGUSA Simon
Carlos Eugênio Simon opened his third World Cup with a combative Anglophone clash between England and the United States. No doubt that Simon had experience after 2002 and 2006, but here he was simply not up to scratch. This match required a referee who would strongly act against unfair play, but the Brazilian simply failed to do that, in a performance which widely lacked tactical coherency.
Simon's accuracy in crucial situations was not perfect either. Let's start by analysing them.
Key Match Incidents
Key Match Incidents
28' - Penalty to England?
Jay DeMerit holds John Terry's shirt from an England corner in a clearly excessive manner. I can understand the argument that Terry wasn't going to reach the ball anyway in the event of a more trifling holding offence, but in this instance the holding is so blatant and unfair that it cannot go unpunished.
CRUCIAL MISTAKE
59' - Serious Foul Play by Jamie Carragher?
Two points to make here:
Two points to make here:
1) I would like to see tackles such as these taken out of matches and punished with red cards. My strong preference is for Carragher to be dismissed here.
2) However, in the end I would argue that a dark yellow card is ultimately supportable:
2) However, in the end I would argue that a dark yellow card is ultimately supportable:
- Studs contact made is mostly with the top of the Robbie Findley's boot and not the shin
- Second leg contact is a simple kick and does not trap Findley's leg in a dangerous manner
I would be the first person to strongly praise Simon had he sent Carragher off, but issuing a yellow card is still (just) supportable in my eyes.
60' - Serious Foul Play by Steven Gerrard?
Gerrard plays the ball in a fair manner before making a high contact on Clint Dempsey with his boot partly pulled out. There are some arguments to eject Gerrard for this foul, however given the ball-playing-ness of the tackle in addition to the England player negating the worst of a potential hit, yellow card is the correct outcome in my book.
I would be the first person to strongly praise Simon had he sent Carragher off, but issuing a yellow card is still (just) supportable in my eyes.
60' - Serious Foul Play by Steven Gerrard?
Gerrard plays the ball in a fair manner before making a high contact on Clint Dempsey with his boot partly pulled out. There are some arguments to eject Gerrard for this foul, however given the ball-playing-ness of the tackle in addition to the England player negating the worst of a potential hit, yellow card is the correct outcome in my book.
74' - Serious Foul Play by Robbie Findley?
This time I can't find any reason to support Simon not showing a red - very dangerous studded contact with Gerrard's shin; Findley had to go for this. A caution was not enough.
CRUCIAL MISTAKE
Approach
Even besides those KMIs, Carlos Simon simply did not offer a convincing performance in this match. His tactic should have been to punish heavy and tactical foul tackles with cautions (James Milner late at 7', Terry's tactical foul at 18') from the start. The players did not reward Simon's generosity, and tried to test the Brazilian referee to the limit of his tolerance line throughout the match (including in the United States penalty area).
Opening caution was quite messy - not a bad choice to book Milner at 26' (after 7'), but on a mimic and whistle tone level his presentation was rather poor. He allowed everyone to be surprised by his choice! Jozy Altidore's fully deliberate handling at 36' stopped a pass being played which would have reached an England player - a clear yellow card in 2010. DeMerit should also have been cautioned (if not more) for his bizarre foul on Emile Heskey at 43'.
Simon also ought to have issued cards in the second half at 78' (reckless stamp), and for tactical fouls at 82', 85'. While the latter two of the bunch were embolic of a performance really deficient in preventative refereeing, perhaps it is Frank Lampard's heavy foul at 78' going totally missed which is the most worrying - Lampard correctly gambled that he would be able to get away with it.
To me it seems the Brazilian referee struggled to grasp what the players wanted to achieve in this match - they needed a referee who would allow quite a lot of physical contact in assessing duels, but also taking tactical and heavy fouls out of the match by punishing them with cautions. Simon did not take the initiative in this match and it always felt as if he was playing catch up. Only the card to Milner was in any way a tactical choice - in the other five cases he was simply forced to act.
Players did not challenge Simon's supercilious leadership style on the pitch, as he allowed them to get away with a lot - a microcosm of this was offered at 55' when the referee gave a verbal warning to Carragher's back. Ordering the players to turn around in order to see their shirt numbers, 1990-style, was rather rude in my opinion.
Further points: referee was hit by the ball at 42', late to recognise his assistant Roberto Braatz's flag at 52', did Carragher not impede Findley at 73' (which probably annoyed him, hence the SFP foul) and his choice of whistle did not exude the most natural authority.
Overall: this rather ropey approach by Simon saw him not fail in this game, but equally, we should ponder whether really he succeeded either (- 0,3). One man springs to mind as the perfect man for this game, but given his experiences with the States four years earlier, he was never going to be appointed.
Balance
Carlos Eugênio Simon was the only referee of all the games on the first two days of the competition to operate an approach not apt for what was in front of him. Besides missing a clear penalty and not giving a red card when he might have shown two, Simon was unfortunately taken for something of a fool by the players. One must say that the Brazilian referee faced a tough game here, but it would also be remise to not detail his quite extensive shortcomings.
Roberto Braatz faced a challenging few minutes at the start of the second half - a tricky situation was well-seen at 51', but he made a clear and important mistake at 54' to flag Heskey offside. Altemir Hausmann correctly detected an offside in first half additional time.
This match was obviously extensively discussed in US circles at the time. I had many comments, but a few of the more pertinent ones are below. Essentially, I believed:
ReplyDelete1) Milner should have been booked at 7'.
2) The US should have conceded a penalty 28'.
3) Carragher should have been sent off.
4) Yellow card to Gerrad was fine.
5) Findlay should have been sent off.
6) Simon officiated this like it was an EPL match in his mind, rather than a South American battle. And the results spoke for themselves.
https://www.bigsoccer.com/threads/analysis-eng-usa-simon-bra-r.1451360/page-2#post-20974945
https://www.bigsoccer.com/threads/analysis-eng-usa-simon-bra-r.1451360/page-3#post-20976242
https://www.bigsoccer.com/threads/analysis-eng-usa-simon-bra-r.1451360/page-3#post-20977196
Two other points, given what you wrote above.
ReplyDeleteFirst, I agree Larrionda would have been perfect this match but could never have happened. It was always Simon or Ruiz.
Second, Simon couldn't send off Findlay after only booking Carragher. I would agree that Findlay's was slightly worse than Carragher's. But given the overall context of the match and the striking similarity between the two challenges, it would have been an impossible and unwise hair to split. I'm not sure if Simon recognized that at the time--maybe he just reflexively went yellow on Findlay. But when you step back and examine the whole match, it becomes clear it had to be two reds or no reds for those two tackles.
Carlos Simon was not necessarily the referee I had in mind when it comes to who would have the first bad performance of this World Cup. The Brazilian was certainly and odd sort of referee with mixed results, but he was nevertheless a good one and with two WCs under his belt, his performance becomes even more disappointing.
ReplyDeleteMissed opening card for Milner's somehow ridiculous foul at 7' was the start, but while his decision to book him for PI in 26' was emblematic: It was something that had to happen, but his way of handling it made it a really surprising decision. Immediate action was required.
Add a missed penalty and in my eyes at least two missed RCs for SFP to the mix of a performance that was below WC standard and more importantly, his own. Simon did not seem to find his own line in disciplinary matters and despite handing out more cards than e.g. Stark or Irmatov, his overall disciplinary control and match control was much much poorer.
I do agree with USAREF regarding the RCs. In my book, Carragher's foul is even worse than Findley's - look at how the ankle of the USA player is bent! Findley's hit point is higher and way over the top, but the risk of injury is actually worse with Carragher. Both should have walked, but Simon lacked the bravado he had in earlier tournaments to take such big decisions.
Indeed. If we look back over Simon's WC career, what separates his strong performances from the weak ones - we can see it's immediately and consistently taking action against unfair play (MEXITA, ESPTUN).
DeleteIt's a shame he didn't do the same here; if he had have done, both the game and his whole WC might have turned out differently.
Review by MARCA.com: 7/10. Controlled the situation and showed the cards when LOTG asked for them.
ReplyDelete(What a contrast! :D)