08 GERAUS Rodríguez

 



Marco Rodríguez was back at the World Cup. The beneficiary of Carlos Batres' knee problem and Peter Prendergast not telling FIFA about an injury revealed on a scan in 2006, he was in South Africa as one of CONCACAF's top three names. In those four interceding years he certainly didn't lose any amount of courage - he sent Cahill off, rightly in my view, when many of his colleagues wouldn't have, and refereed this game in a mostly satisfying way, though having left some relatively large doubts at the same time. 

Crucial incidents is where we start again.

Key Match Incidents


48' - Penalty to Australia?

Principally, I would say Per Mertesacker's handling should be punished - despite the close distance, the Germany defender enlarges his body surface to stop the headed shot at goal. On a didactic level - penalty. 

Practically it is more difficult. I can't really see the scope for Rodríguez nor AR José Luis Camargo to see that. Perhaps only a fourth official following Pedro Proença's instructions would really have had a chance to see it, and even then, probably couldn't have been sure.

A good case-in-point for Video Assistant Refereeing, maybe :)


56' - Red Card to Tim Cahill

Two schools of thought about this red card:


1) It's a World Cup game, Cahill's tackle is not really in danger of seriously hurting Bastien Schweinsteiger, yellow card is enough there, regardless of whether he went in to hurt him (at first). 


2) Debrief is important here. 

- If Rodríguez saw Cahill's tackle as simply late but (mis)perceived studs as being what made contact then the decision was a mistake.

- If however, he saw Cahill fly in late to hurt Schweinsteiger, ie. a tackle as an attack, then the Australia player pulling back his studs is immaterial - he deserved to be sent off regardless.

-> Tim Cahill's reaction sells to me exactly what he does. Cahill obviously sees the red mist and flies in, and then pulls his studs out in an effort not to be sent off. 

His amazement at being sent off is synthetic, he knows that he did lose his head with that tackle, hence him not actually being annoyed / furious at the decision, as anyone would be if they felt they had genuinely been wrongly sent off in a World Cup game. Merely, his attempts to save himself failed, Rodríguez saw through them. 


So, for me, correct and a brave decision to send Cahill off. However, it would be wrong not to acknowledge that there were worse tackles even amongst the games thus far, which were not punished with a red card.


65' - Second Yellow Card to Carl Valeri?

In essence, Valeri should have been sent off. His standing leg tackle lacked the force to do very serious damage, but was certainly reckless in my book.

However, Rodríguez probably solved this in the most sensible way - given that Valeri did try and reduce the force of his tackle once he saw that the ball wasn't reachable, the reactions of the players and the controversial nature of Cahill's dismissal, it was probably sensible to not reduce Australia to nine. 

Approach


Marco Rodríguez, as in 2006, showed no fear of being in the limelight in his games. Excellent decisions such as the one to caution Mesut Özil early on for a clear dive, are a result of that. Others, such as that to book Craig Moore for an aggressive dissent towards AR Camargo, are simply good officiating in my book.

However, Rodríguez showed some fairly large deficiencies in managing the game and the players in my view. I would contest +92', but in principle all of his cautions were correct - however, I missed what wider tactical approach they were part of. 

Fouls at 29', 35' and 42' were all worthy of a caution, or if not issuing a card, Rodríguez should have at least made sure that everybody knew he wasn't going to tolerate play like this. Just blowing for the offences, albeit with decent whistle language at 42', was not enough. 

Decisions such as that and the chaotic restart at 22', a missed foul at 43' and the way he sold the (fully correct) booking at 58', simply made the players more anxious than was necessary. They didn't really know what this referee was going to do next. 

Despite his rather photogenic presence (and if I may say so, the Mexican trio looked rather dashing in their long-sleeved yellow shirts :)), Rodríguez also lacked soft skills. He actually seemed like a rather shy man on the pitch, sometimes unwilling to take charge of the situation (first half corner altercation, 48', 58'). Actually that makes the courage he had in his games all the more impressive in my view! 

Though less impressive when he rather capriciously cautions Cacau at +92' for a dive in the midfield. It didn't matter this late in a 4-0 game, but the Germany player jumps over the leg that would have hit him, before falling a bit more theatrically when he realises he isn't going to reach the ball. That's not really simulation in my book. Fine, but cautions were much better used in other situations in this game than there!

Balance

Overall, Marco Rodríguez handled this game in a mostly satisfying way. Personally, I really appreciated the courage he showed to send off Tim Cahill - it is not okay to pretend to tackle someone when you simply try to hurt them, even if you try to reduce the impact at the end. Cahill knows he lost his head, his frustration should be at himself, not the Mexican referee.

However, Rodríguez also showed quite significant deficiencies as a referee. No matter here really, but in a challenging game, he could find himself in pretty big trouble.

Challenging first half for nearside AR José Luis Camargo - contrary to Craig Moore's rather angry assertion, the only mistake he made was an incorrect flag actually favouring Australia at 15' (- 0,2). Otherwise, he played three very good and important onsides. Alberto Morín correctly allowed the 4-0 goal to stand.

Marco Rodríguez - 8,3
José Luis Camargo - 8,4
Alberto Morín - 8,4
Martin Hansson
Hendrik Andrén


MEX – SWE
Germany 4-0 Australia

Group Stage


13 June
Gelbe Karten 
Özil (12') - Simulation
Cacau (+92') - Simulation
Gelbe Karten 
Moore (24') - Dissent
Neill (46') - Charging
Valeri (58') - Tripping
Rote Karten 
Cahill (56') - Serious Foul Play

Comments

  1. Once more, I can only agree with what you said. There was much to like about Rodríguez, especially the cards he gave - not many might have done. But during the match, there were the flaws you laid out. In all fairness, I still thought he had a good game, but his next one would find him in more trouble.

    But I don't want to sound too critical. Rodríguez attended three World Cups and in general, was one of the referees I quite liked to watch.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I apparently wasn't convinced by Rodriguez at the time--at least after the first half. And I was not sold on the red card. A lot of commentary on this match back then, but here are a few highlights of my opinions. Seems like my opinion boiled down to Rodriguez being too lax with Australia's physicality and then trying to clamp down severely and at the wrong moment.

    https://www.bigsoccer.com/threads/analysis-ger-aus-rodriguez-mex.1458744/#post-20986101
    https://www.bigsoccer.com/threads/analysis-ger-aus-rodriguez-mex.1458744/#post-20986612
    https://www.bigsoccer.com/threads/analysis-ger-aus-rodriguez-mex.1458744/page-3#post-20989361
    https://www.bigsoccer.com/threads/analysis-ger-aus-rodriguez-mex.1458744/page-5#post-21001730

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And now, having read your analysis Mikael, I think we were mostly on the same page. Rodriguez missed several cautions that I felt needed to be punished and then sanctioned an SFP card that wasn't being called to-date at that tournament. The inconsistency and the lack of any soft skills were the big problems for me.

      Delete
  3. A couple more points...

    Watching the highlights and nothing changes my opinion that Australia was just petulant and dirty throughout. Their anger at AR1, who kept getting every call correct, was almost comical.

    Would you support a red card for the Neill challenge at 46'? Remind me a lot of the challenge that hurt Neymar in 2014.

    The 92+' yellow card is classic Rodriguez--in a bad way. Who wants that card? The German player is avoiding a challenge and doesn't even appeal for the foul. How is that simulation to deceive a referee? Ugh.

    And, yes, Valeri needed to go.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Like you, the Neill incident reminded me of the Neymar one - rewatching it, the two are actually quite different.

      Here is the Neymar one for reference:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qTXMv9aAt8

      Neill's one actually looks MORE dangerous... though at least his was targeted at trying to reach the ball.

      I wonder if red carding these sort of challenges are the next big 'revolution' in football refereeing in say 20/30yrs time, after which people will look back in the same way we do now and gorp now at what players could get away with at eg. WC 1990 and before.

      Delete
    2. Agreed totally that Neill was worse than the foul on Neymar. I think, at the time, I argued against a red card for the Colombian player, despite the result. Here? Neill's action is deliberate and dirty--I'd have been fine with a red card, though obviously it wouldn't have been sellable in this exact scenario.

      Delete
  4. Just more widely on Rodríguez - he absolutely fascinates me as a referee and as a person. Definitely one of the most interesting men in C.21st refereeing thus far in my opinion.

    It wouldn't be wrong to call Rodríguez a law-enforcer who has lots of guts and no feeling for the game - but then he also took decisions in this WC that certainly lacked courage, and also decisions which were quite valuable self-preservation (game-feeling) too.

    He always comes across as a nice person in interviews (to me anyway), and the way he chatted with Cacau at the end here, one arouses the impression he is genuinely sorry to have booked him. I genuinely mean this a compliment - I always thought he was too nice a person to be a football referee!

    And yet, despite (previously) being the type of referee FIFA were blatantly trying to eliminate since Busacca took over in 2011, he first all of quite incredibly managed to be there at all in 2014, and then even got the Brazil SF.

    I don't know his personal circumstances and could be wrong but if his 2014 tournament ended at ITAURU and not the famous SF, I would be quite sure he would work hard to attend (and do better at) WC 2018.

    There is more to say in future matches and projects but I find Rodríguez as a person quite remarkable :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed, his selection for WC 2014 was a huge surprise due to his style that seemed totally opposite to what FIFA was looking for... anyone has an inside info on that?

      Delete
    2. Rodríguez vs. García for 2014 is certainly a 'battle' worthy of extensive analysis for that (potential) future project :)

      Delete
    3. Garcia Orozco was unlucky not to have attended a World Cup. He reached his prime at an unfortunate time in his career. Garcia Orozco was first up against the likes of B.A. Archundia and M.A. Rodriguez. And later while still in his prime it was Ramoz Palazuelos who became the chosen one. IMO this choice being made strictly based on age and not on actual ability. As IMO Garcia Orozco was a better referee than Ramos Palazuelos.

      Delete
  5. Review by MARCA.com: 6/10. Mexican referee tried to be the protagonist without success. Ejected Cahill in 56' a bit rigorously.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts