21 GERSRB Undiano
Serbia upset Germany by a goal-to-nothing in game most Western observers agree was tarnished by an overly strict application of the laws by referee Alberto Undiano Mallenco from Spain. Undiano controversially had Klose off with a shade less than an hour remaining, shortly after which Serbia scored.
Germany did the unthinkable to a (tabloid) British audience and miss a correctly awarded second half penalty, and Serbia ultimately held on for a shock win. Balkan nation were back in with a shout of progressing, and the possibility of Germany being eliminated now became a very tangible one.
It seems funny to us now (nothing against him personally by the way, just an observation on modern refereeing), but Undiano Mallenco was seen as the future by FIFA, who aggressively pushed him after the last World Cup. He was a bit unlucky that his ultra-consistent style met this particular match in his World Cup debut.
With Germany's penalty missed, the most important decision of the afternoon was the second caution to Miroslav Klose, but we'll come to that slightly later. First, the penalty that was given, another that perhaps should have been.
Penalty Area Incidents
59' - Penalty to Germany
Nemanja Vidić totally lost his nerve and seeing the ball was going over his head, handled the ball in a very deliberate manner (he had form for it, actually). A sense of dejà vu, for those who watched Serbia's match with Ghana. The slight delay in the whistle suggests that nearside AR Fermin Martínez Ibáñez made the call, a clearly correct one, well seen by him despite being quite far away (+ 0,1).
Nemanja Vidić totally lost his nerve and seeing the ball was going over his head, handled the ball in a very deliberate manner (he had form for it, actually). A sense of dejà vu, for those who watched Serbia's match with Ghana. The slight delay in the whistle suggests that nearside AR Fermin Martínez Ibáñez made the call, a clearly correct one, well seen by him despite being quite far away (+ 0,1).
+92' - Potential penalty to Germany?
Well - Mario Gómez is simply kicked by Dejan Stanković in the penalty area, isn't he? Gómez has beaten him to the ball, and Stanković gets there late and kicks his leg; one senses the Serbia player knows that as well, and the injury he sustains from the duel is an attempt to muddy the waters for the referee, who as it happens isn't terribly interested.
Stanković was not trying to make a tackle for the ball so much as kick it, and the bad luck of it all is why it doesn't really 'feel' like a penalty - insofar as that matters - really one should be given there. Germany's complaints were not directed here, though.
Approach
To understand the sending off of Miroslav Klose, you have to understand what Undiano tried to do in this game and indeed what he tried to do in all of his games throughout his career.Klose was on his radar from the start. Actually, breaking rank from the accepted account of what happened in this game, I think Undiano's dealing of his fouls was textbook until he was sent off. He was late at 8' (haha) on Branislav Ivanović, and the Spanish referee issued him a deserved warning.
Then, when he deliberately tripped, again, Ivanović to prevent a quite promising attack - look at Sami Khedira running back to his position after the foul - I don't really see what other option Undiano had here, besides following through on his word or doing nothing. If you wanted to, you could have avoided this caution, but such wasn't his style.
The major issue with his performance was the second yellow card. Klose continued buzzing around after his first yellow card and continued fouling players in a clearly careless manner. He had taken no need of the ref's warning.
I do wonder how ball orientated his foul was on Dejan Stanković that got him sent off at 36' - totally, and Staković got him with smart play? Just aimed at hitting the Serbia player, to prevent him playing the ball that was on nearside? Or just a bit lazy and not really bothered if he got man or ball?
I can't actually call this decision wrong, what I can say is that it was very unwise. Klose was very stupid with this referee to do what he did, and Undiano acted as you would have expected him to. It is tribute to him in a way that his refereeing was so ideological, even to the detriment of what he could later achieve in his career.
There was a wider problem with his performance though. While as a refereeing person I could perfectly predict when Undiano was and was not going to whistle a foul (2', 25') or not issue a caution for a challenge because it was careless (44', 52', 54', 71' and even 79', a clear second yellow card nowadays), I don't think the players really knew what he was going to do next.
Spanish referee faced the unfortunate situation for him that the players were happy to kick each other and just get on with it. A referee with game feeling would be able to pick and choose his sanctions, probably gamble with control a bit, and ultimately bring the game to a nice conclusion for everyone. Undiano was not that man, for better or worse.
Balance
Alberto Undiano Mallenco simply executed his style, actually quite effectively, on this game as FIFA knew he would do in his games. Of course, Klose's sending off is very contested, even if he was pretty stupid to test this referee, but generally speaking the Spaniard did not so much as get a single decision wrong all afternoon.
Undiano was actually pretty unlucky to find himself in the middle of this particular game, where the technically correct decisions and the practically optimal decisions were quite far apart. The result was a performance widely denounced, not least here in Britain (besides Germany) at the time.
I guess his performance touches on the fault-lines of modern refereeing - for some, an excellent piece of officiating that is sorely missed nowadays, or others, a nightmare for which the football understanding revolution which would follow this tournament couldn't come soon enough. At least, Pierluigi Collina who would lead UEFA Refereeing after this tournament, had made up his mind.
Regarding ARs: two correct offside calls from Yuste Jiménez in the first half, the capricious and excellent Martínez Ibáñez was very quiet besides the penalty call.
I clearly remember this match and, as you said, it was very weird that an (almost) textbook refereeing was seen as not fitting and Undiano would ultimately pay for it. You chose the perfect description for Klose's red card: correct, but unwise. I felt sorry for Undiano! He would have deserved more at WC10. With respect to the next WC, it would have been another Spanish referee anyway, since there was not a single Spanish referee who attended two WCs in the last 40 years, regardless of their performance.
ReplyDeleteI don't really think Undiano payed for it in this tournament, he couldn't really have gone further than he did (R16), but Collina really didn't appreciate his style and strongly pushed Velasco instead. Were it not for Collina, Undiano would probably have attended WC 2014 too - Villar Llona's lobbying would have been enough I think, but Busacca respected Collina's judgement on the European refs a lot.
DeleteCollina even threw him under the bus here :D
https://streamable.com/mwos79
Why do you think that he could not have gone further at WC10?
DeleteFor WC14 it would have been impossible. As I said earlier, please have a look at the Spanish referees appointed to WC in the last 40+ years. There was no repeat, regardless of how good or bad they were. Once a WC ends, they always push another referee; it cannot be just coincidence for over 40 years with no exception.
Because of how well Spain did! Okay he could have gotten the Uruguay - Ghana QF (for which he was fourth official) but besides that, he did as well as he could have expected.
DeleteLet's test the Spain WC refs hypothesis. I can't speak for 1978 and before, but from then:
1982 - Augusto Lamo Castillo retired at the end of the 85-86 season, and probably wasn't welcome back after his poor performance in the Brazil - Soviet Union game.
1986 - Victoriano Sánchez Arminio retired at the end of the 88-89 season, and there was a general consensus he was too lenient in the Argentina - Korea Republic game that he handled.
1990 - Emilio Soriano Aladrén attended this tournament aged forty-five, and after it FIFA reduced the age limit from fifty to forty-five, so he had no chance to attend WC 1994 whilst aged forty-nine. He failed both as linesman (URSROU) and referee (NEDEGY).
1994 - Manuel Díaz Vega despite a decent performance in the Netherlands - Saudi Arabia was rejected by FIFA, so there was little point in nominating / selecting him again.
1998 - José García-Aranda had a successful tournament, and retired at the end of the 2000-01 season.
2002 - Antonio López Nieto, who was a bit unlucky not to attend previous tournaments, aged forty-four had a very controversial but IMO actually quite good performance in the impossible Cameroon - Germany match.
2006 - Manuel Mejuto González teammate(s) failed him in the fitness test, so also WC debutant Luis Medina Cantalejo stepped in, and had an excellent tournament.
2010 - Alberto Undiano Mallenco was aggressively pushed by FIFA, and beat Mejuto González to be pre-selected, having IMO a good but very controversial tournament.
2014 - Carlos Velasco Carballo beat Undiano to the selection, despite lots of signals to the contrary. Undiano had a good game in the Iceland - Croatia playoff, and had seemed to do enough to win his spot. However, on the recommendation of Collina (NOT RFEF), Busacca instead chose Velasco. To me this is enough to discredit the theory anyway, Undiano could easily have been selected over Velasco.
2018 - Antonio Mateu Lahoz 'beat' Undiano (who was not a top UEFA ref by this point) to the pre-selection and deservedly attended WC 2018, where contrary to the Italy - Sweden playoff, he had an unspectacular tournament.
2022 - FIFA have rejected ALL of the European refs who attended 2018, for pre-selection this time, (eg. Skomina) besides only Turpin, and not just Mateu. My fear is another 'revolution' may be coming, look at what Brian Hall is doing in CONCACAF, but we will see.
-> A mixture of RFEF probably using the WC as a 'career reward' in the early period, poor performances and circumstance explains why Spain didn't 'repeat' a referee for the WC.
For instance in that time, Mejuto attended EURO 2004 and 2008 and Velasco both 2012 and 2016 - surely they would have pushed Medina (for 2008) and Mateu (for 2016) if they were really doctrinal about it?
Great analysis, Mikael.
DeleteTrend is expected to continue as Del Cerro Grande seems to be ahead of Gil Manzano in the race for 2022 so the former, in spite of age limits being abolished (possibly done ad-hoc for him because CTA-RFEF was aware that Gil Manzano had little chances to attend WC) is very unlikely, almost impossible I'd say, to repeat in 2026 in case he attends 2022.
Basically all selected referees except Díaz Vega and Undiano Mallenco were already above 45 years old by the time the next WC was celebrated. Spain usually sends 'veteran' referees to WC, I'm fine with that if they are the best.
Medina Cantalejo retired due to age limits in 2009 so he couldn't attend 2010 and another referee (Undiano) had to be pushed. 2006 preseason was a carnage, Mejuto González's trio was sent home because of ARs failing fitness tests; Vassarás, Prendergast and Batres got injured and Massimo de Santis had to be removed due to his involvement in the Calciopoli scandal (and replaced by Rosetti :)). We will probably never see that again, I remember that in 2018 Al-Mirdasi's full trio was sent home and also Gassama's regular AR from Kenya, both for bribery scandals.
Btw did FIFA also drop Marciniak for 2022? I thought he was pre-selected...
Apologies - Marciniak has been preselected too :)
DeleteI agree with your explanations, Michael and Quilava. Regardless of the reason, there was no repeat of Spanish WC refs and that is expected to continue for at least 22 (Del Cerro, not Mateu) and 26 (Gil, not Del Cerro). In my opinion, it is good for countries with more than one top referee to offer the chance to attend a WC to different referees, from different generations, rather than the same ref going 2-3 times. I do not think anyone will ever reach Seitz's performance with 4 WWCs. Rodriguez and Irmatov were the closest, but they stopped.
DeleteI know way less about Spanish refereeing than most of you, I'm sure. But two thoughts...
DeleteWasn't Diaz Vega invovled in some sort of betting scandal after his UCL Final? I thought that was the main reason why FIFA kept him at arm's length in the 90s and made a 1998 appointment impossible. Maybe I'm wrong and Garcia-Aranda was always the #1 for 1998. But my perspective was that Diaz Vega would have gone to two World Cups if not for the scandal... which he was eventually cleared of.
Mejuto Gonzalez is the most interesting case to me. Seems like he was the best Spanish referee of the last 30 years. If his AR doesn't fail fitness for 2006 and he has a good tournament... I think he has a great chance of returning in 2010 in his final year as a FIFA referee. But maybe I have that wrong. We'll never know, of course!
Díaz Vega was accused of possible bribery by former referee Kurt Roethilsberger, to favor Switzerland in a Norway-Switzerland qualifying for the 98 World Cup. But he was acquitted and that had nothing to do with him not being chosen for that World Cup. In Spain López Nieto was number 1 at that time, but FIFA chose García-Aranda, who made a great World Cup.
Delete
DeleteIMO Mejuto was not the best Spanish referee in the last 30 years. He was a great referee, but he lacked the courage to make crucial decisions. In the physical tests for the 2006 World Cup, his two assistants (Martínez Samaniego and Ayete Plou) failed and only the reserve assistant (Yuste Jiménez) surpassed them.
... which allowed Medina to have a very successful World Cup!
DeleteI would argue that combined the two cards for Klose were too much, but the problem can not be isolated. Undiano Mallenco consequently punished such infringements - way more strict than most other referees did at this tournament. That is exactly what sunk him - the media outcry (especially since Germany lost) was huge and this sort of refereeing was what FIFA wanted to eliminate to avoid "boring matches" and - heaven prevent - favourites losing.
ReplyDeleteA bit of irony that Undiano Mallenco was the one to have such a match... His later performances were much less "colourful" and while I do not like him as a referee, one has to feel a bit for him. Albeit that he still got two further appointments (including KO stage). Better referees in the past got less.
Review by MARCA.com: 4/10. So-so, he incorrectly sent off Klose in 37'.
ReplyDelete