06 ALGSVN Batres
A very challenging game to referee for Carlos Batres, not because of what he faced on the pitch itself, but the circumstance surrounding it. This game was in the early slot on the third day of the competition, a Sunday.
The appointed officials for this game were Pablo Pozo's trio from Chile, supported by Martin Hansson. However, in training on the Tuesday before, Pozo sprained his ankle - he would not be able to recover in time. FIFA appointed Carlos Batres' trio from Central America with in his stead, O'Leary was the new fourth official.
Overnight on the Wednesday, Batres had the worst possible news - he learnt of his mother's death back home in Guatemala. He wouldn't be able to attend her funeral for attending the World Cup, which must really have hurt. Not least having to referee one of the most important games of his career a few days later.
Batres showed remarkable fortitude to step out on to the pitch that day, and in so far as it possible to, below there is some words on his (decent) performance, starting with the most important decisions he had to take.
Key Match Incidents
30' - Violent Conduct by Hassan Yebda?
Yes, the correct solution here is to eject Yebda. He strikes Marko Šuler in the face with excessive force, which should be punished with a red card.
I wouldn't blame Batres too much here, he was just following the ball from the blocked cross out. The situation was probably out of Honduran assistant Carlos Pastrana's vicinity (his niece is Melissa Borjas, by the way :)); but fourth official Peter O'Leary should really have seen that, being in his control zone. Yebda was fortunate.
64' - Penalty to Slovenia?
Nobody appeals here, but I cannot really find a reason why this shouldn't be a penalty! It's obvious that everybody thinks the tackle was ball-playing and fair, but the replays show that clearly isn't the case. Perhaps the argument that Milivoje Novaković was in some way unfairly shielding the ball from a defender who he knew was coming stands up? Not for me.
It would take incredible confidence in one's own perception to give that as a penalty, and probably you can construct some argument to back the referee there.
73' - Second Yellow Card to Abdelkader Ghezzal
Algeria player does not literally try to score with his arm, but given that he tried to take the p*ss out of the referee (-> showing a lack of respect for the game) with such a blatant handling, a yellow card and ensuing ejection was expected by everybody. Personally, I wouldn't assess it as a mistake if Batres didn't send him off, but doing so was clearly the sensible option.
+95' - Serious Foul Play by Hassan Yebda?
In my opinion this is a scandalous 'tackle'. While Nejc Pečnik is following the high ball, his opponent rakes his studs down the back of his thigh, in what was poorly disguised as an attempt to reach the ball.
The way Batres solves it, he cannot have seen what happened there. The caution he eventually sorted out to Yebda was not enough - he had to go.
In my opinion this is a scandalous 'tackle'. While Nejc Pečnik is following the high ball, his opponent rakes his studs down the back of his thigh, in what was poorly disguised as an attempt to reach the ball.
The way Batres solves it, he cannot have seen what happened there. The caution he eventually sorted out to Yebda was not enough - he had to go.
CRUCIAL MISTAKE
Balance
Besides that, I don't think Batres offered the best performance of the tournament so far. While his card choices were predictable and good (35', 59', +93'), he was not really a preventative leader on the pitch. There were times where he ought to have increased his presence and / or issue sanctions (7', 38', 68') but Batres didn't.
The game finished in some kind of chaos. Missed corner at 82', missed striking offences at 86' and 87', and a missed (at least) reckless off-the-ball foul at 90', all riled the players up. You could see it in the nature of the tackle at +93', and finally in Yebda's assault at the end. Guatemalan referee was fortunate that the clock read 95 and not 85, for if there were more playing minutes he would have been in big trouble.
I don't even think Batres was that passive per se, but his rigidly central positioning made it hard for him to really take the initiative in this game (reminded me a bit of Felipe Ramos Rizo in 2002). Not only in terms of making it harder to assess incidents, it limited his presence out there quite significantly.
In the end, this game was just about making it through for Carlos Batres, and he did indeed do that. He passed here, and assured himself of a second match. Job done.
Another mostly quiet game for both assistant referees, expected level.
Batres had to referee under mental circumstances I wish on no one. He did seem a bit off indeed, disciplinary and foul detection were shaky at times, with too many simple mistakes inbetween. The tackle in 95' is a good example, he simply "took a guess" because he was not in the best position to see what had happened here.
ReplyDeleteAs for the four major scenes, my preferred solutions would be: RC for VC (hard to see), penalty for SVN (a weird case), SYC for Ghezzal (a must in my eyes, the attempt to cheat is far too blatant and, with all respect, stupid to be ignored), RC for SFP (he did not see it properly, but regardless of contact, Yebda does not pull back even after he can clearly see his foot is going nowhere near the ball).
Batres did not "screw up" in bad match that must have been tiring, but he did not make a strong case for further appointments.
Followed closely WC2010, but never heard those stories about Pozo and Batres. Out of curiosity, did you gather them from public media or from personal connections?
ReplyDeleteHad no other commentary at the time other than the same philosophical question over the 2YC that you also have here!
ReplyDeletehttps://www.bigsoccer.com/threads/analysis-alg-svn-batres-gua.1458743/#post-20982671
I knew about the Pozo injury, as it was public knowledge at the time and Pozo's appointment was published. Had no idea about Batres' mother, though. Amazing to know now. Like you, I don't think this was Batres' best match. But as I've said elsewhere, I think Batres was the best non-Mexican CONCACAF referee of the lat 30 years, and glad he had an extensive World Cup career.
I guess the one point I made back then that I didn't see you note is that it was pretty clear Batres had no idea Ghezzal was already on a caution when he made the decision to pull the yellow that led to the red.
DeleteFound the news about Batres' mother on Wikipedia. By the way, why did he skip WC 2006, between his 2 WC appearances in 2002 and 2010?
ReplyDeleteKnee injury.
DeleteThe general consensus among the CONCACAF referee community was that 2010 version of Carlos Batres was not in the best physical shape heading into the tournament. He was "fit enough" to pass the pre tournament exams. But not at the level of fitness that allowed him to cover the pitch in his usual manner. And so he was limited to mostly staying centrally throughout his matches. Very seldom did he go "deep and wide".
ReplyDeleteTotally agree.
DeleteReview by MARCA.com: 7/10. Good. He correctly sent off Ghezzal for 2 stupid YCs.
ReplyDelete